Friday, 6 June 2025

Maison Benjamin Kuentz Uisce de Profundis 3 yo

 
 
 
40°
Distillery Officially Unknown - France
Bourbon Casks
Independent Bottling 
By Maison Benjamin Kuentz
Limited Edition 
Single Malt 
Bottled in 2021
Totally Unpeated
 
 
 
It was back in 2020 that the crafty Benjamin Kuentz revealed his plans for a whisky aged under the sea. At the time, it wasn't necessarily an idiotic attempt, as barrels had been lowered under the sea in collaboration with Amphoris, a slightly mad company, and La Prohibition, a whisky bar in the heart of Paris. The next Batch, which dates from 2021, is already less interesting, because it wasn't casks but bottles that were plunged under the sea, 20 metres deep in the waters off the island of Ouessant in Brittany. It was this Batch that I tasted. Of the 800 bottles that were immersed, only 318 came out worthy of drinking. The whisky is 3 years old, which is very young, and was aged in simple Bourbon casks. It was immersed in the sea for one year, which seems a long time to me. The distillery involved is secret, but according to an auction website, it is Grallet-Dupic, a distillery in Lorraine that produces the Rozelieures brand. It doesn't say whether the whisky has been chill-filtered, coloured or not, or whether there's an ounce of peat inside. I think it's a product marketed for people who don't know anything about whisky, and so would never ask. On Whiskybase, it says that this product is Cask Strength and Single Cask, but I don't believe it. Cask strength whiskies that are 40° are at least 30 years old, and they are never exactly 40°.
 
 
 

Let's Taste It : 
The nose is fairly sweet, delicious vanilla, shortbread pastry, some yellow fruits, plums, pears, bananas. But there's also a lot of unrefined Guerande sea salt, coarse salt, foam, sea spray, sea breeze, it's intense. Guano and limestone, mud and shellfish. On the palate, it's disappointing, you get the impression of drinking seawater, there's a hint of vanilla, but that's all, salt is all that's left, but with a slight bitterness, seaweed, sea urchins, light spices. The finish is very short, falling apart quickly, quite rocky, quartz, pebbles, sandstone, the bitterness is a little stronger, it feels like having gravel in your mouth.
 
In Short, 
Out of respect for my readers, and out of respect for Whisky, I have to be honest. The nose seemed fine to me, you could really feel the Bourbon influence, and what's more there was a nice salty character. As soon as it hit the palate, however, it was a disaster, the aromas collapsing and leaving only alcoholic seawater. The finish is very short and bitter. Moreover, I was shocked to learn of the price of this very mediocre product, not even on a par with a Talisker Skye. This is an astronomical price, at which you can buy 25-year-old single casks from excellent distilleries. Don't buy a 3 year old at that price, I'm sorry but it's a rip-off, pure and simple. It's all the more outrageous given that Benjamin Kuentz has launched an online fundraising campaign to finance a new batch of this mixture. If he's getting funding, why are the bottles so expensive? I'm curious to know what his margin is.  
Score : 79 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                           To Be Listened While Sipping : 
 
                                           Soldat Louis - Du Rhum des femmes

2 comments:

  1. I've tried it as well, and I'm surprised you even rate it 80 points. I agree with your comments, the nose was ok, and the palate atrocious, I couldn't even finish the first sip. In my humble opinion it's not even worth 50/100, the nose is not enough to save this whisky. And let's not even talk about the stupid price!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Year I saw your note on Whiskybase! As to me, a whisky below 60 is not drinkable, this is the way I rate Whisky. But you're right, the palate was not good at all. I'm not used to bad whiskies, never know how to rate it.

      Delete